影片库

米迦尔是一名夜间医生。他的病人大多来自动荡的贫民区，比如其他医生根本不屑于接待的瘾君子。他不仅见证着病人们复杂的人际关系，自己也深陷生活的泥沼：不知道如何做一个好丈夫，和情人的关系也越来越不顺利。当一名药剂师亲戚拉他下水，一起贩卖虚假药物，他的人生彻底地脱轨了。又一个夜幕降临，他能不能把握住机会，做出正确的选择，守住自己的良知和底线？

A pit worker is crippled by an accident and his wife flirts with another man.

Each night in Paris, hundreds of men and women anonymously use telephone lines that date from the German Occupation and are no longer listed to talk to each other, to love each other. These people, shipwrecked lovers, are dying to love, to escape the abyss of solitude...

法国经典爱情复仇片，性感女神莫妮卡贝鲁齐激情演出！　　　　地中海的小镇上，彼图和他的好友吉勒斯走在一起。彼图因为被人陷害入狱，今天刚好5年刑满获释。而吉勒斯现在已经成了镇上的黑帮老大。回到哥哥的家里，哥哥已经结婚了，过着充实安逸的生活。然而，让彼图震惊的是，哥哥已经怀孕的妻子，竟是5年前自己的女朋友——性感美丽的玛居丽……她望向彼图的目光中，有幽怨，也有欢欣……　　彼图在迪厅酒吧当服务生，俊郎的他很招女人们的喜爱。5分钟的时间，那个穿粉红色迷你裙的女人就钻进了他的怀里……然而，酒吧里的流氓却惹事了……他们殴打一个男客人，并企图强奸其女友……彼图看不下去，冲上去阻止……那对被流氓殴打的男女带着一群人回到迪厅寻仇……混乱中，流氓开枪打死了他们，并嫁祸给彼图……这时黑帮老大出现了，他表示会帮助彼图，却枪杀了唯一的活口……　　哥哥不愿意彼图连累他，危及他的妻子和家庭；无处可去的彼图只好一路逃亡，暂居一个旧日朋友的家里……然而，老奸巨滑的黑帮老大吉勒斯为了除掉彼图，终于露出了真实面目……他枪杀了彼图的哥哥……彼图也突然明白了原来陷害自己入狱的人正是黑帮老大……愤怒的彼图接过嫂子递过来的枪，开始了疯狂的复仇……

新学期伊始，教师与学生们返回一所普通的社区学校。法语老师兼班主任的弗朗索瓦·马林（François Bégaudeau 饰）面对升一年级的新班级，继续用坦诚又有些好辩的方式教学，这群14岁左右的学生思维活跃，时常在宽松的课堂上反诘马林或是斗嘴、传播八卦，马林不得不一次次中断进度，解决无数琐碎的问题。这所学校内汇聚了来自多国的移民学生，随之而来的问题时常在课堂细节中体现，马林试图尽量让学生们找到自尊，但这些擅于让老师头疼的孩子似乎不太接受马林的说辞。课堂上的唇枪舌剑与部分学生敌视老师的态度让潜藏着的矛盾随时会爆发。　　本片获2008年戛纳金棕榈奖，由小说原著兼编剧的François Bégaudeau主演。

孤儿塞琳娜(伊莎贝尔·帕斯科饰)继承了她养父的大部分遗产，每天都要承受着她昔日继母的强烈不满。为了求得安宁，她放弃了所继承遗产的一部分，因此，骗色骗财的男友离开了她。于是，塞琳娜感到被遗弃而生活孤单，人生毫无价值。塞琳娜迈上了自杀之路。被救起后，护士热娜维耶芙(莉莎·埃雷迪亚饰)打破各种工作常规，介入到塞琳娜的生活中，积极劝说塞琳娜加入到她的瑜伽教学里来，意图通过瑜伽练习恢复塞琳娜的稳定，使其尽快脱离抑郁症的侵扰。尽管热娜维耶芙发现这对塞琳娜有明显的效果，而塞琳娜的神秘体验也微微触动了灵魂上感情的复苏，但不知为什么，热娜维耶芙的愿望并未实现......

By 1820, Edmund Kean is the most admired Shakespearan actor. But if his art is peerless, his free lifestyle is ill thought of, particularly by the high society. Kean has fallen passionately in love with Countess Elena de Koefeld, the wife of the ambassador of Denmark. Elena loves him too but hesitates to give up her rank in society and follow Kean. On the other hand, Anna, a rich heiress who refuses to marry Lord Mewill, the husband chosen by her parents, confesses her love for Kean and decides to become an actress like him... The aristocrats, outraged by Edmund's profligate ways, decide to boycott his performances and his career is broken. Kean does not recover from such a blow and, on a stormy night, dies in Elena's arms.

这部电影将写实与科幻合而为一。一种传染性性疾病STBO正在国内蔓延，它通过没有感情的性活动传播。　　小偷马克和汉斯欠一个美国女人一笔钱，她限他们两个星期还。他们打算去偷一种专治类似艾滋病的药剂，然后高价转卖。于是他们雇来了亚力克斯，一个正在跟16岁女友丽莎分手的青年。但在计划实施之前，他迷恋上了马克的情妇安娜。丽莎却并没有死心，在他们动手那天她来到了巴黎，使得事情更加复杂化……　　当然，这是个悲剧。Love that burns fast but lasts forever.　　这是导演Leos Carax继《男孩遇见女孩》后的第二部作品，继续他对青春和孤独等题材的关注，也就是在此片的五年之后诞生了影史经典之作——《新桥恋人》。

A part of Joan of Arc's life. At the beginning, Jeanne (Joan) has already left Domremy, she is trying to convince a captain to escort her to moxia.cc the Dauphin. It ends during Jeanne's first battle, at Orleans. Meanwhile, Jeanne is depicted more as a warrior than a saint (all cliches are avoided), with only her faith for strength.

新浪潮老将里维特的雄心大作，分战争篇和监狱篇上下两部。本片以德莱叶和布列松为目标，希望成就新的经典。 传奇历史事件「圣女贞德」发生时，以文字记述事件流传出去的方式尚未普及，因此事件留下来的属于史实的原始记录非常的少。但是圣女贞德的故事，却不断出现在文学作品、舞台剧、歌剧（神剧）与各种电影版本中，这背后一定是有它的原因的。　　该片讲述圣女贞德从被俘，到被审判，直至最后被处死的过程。在1430年5月23日的一场小规模战斗中，贞德被俘虏了。当她下令军队撤退回贡比涅城时，她处在军队的最后方以确保所有人都退回了城里，但就在这时贡比涅城因为害怕英军跟着闯入，没等到所有部队撤回便将城门关下，贞德与剩余的后卫部队便遭到了勃艮第人俘虏。最后法庭总结了贞德的12项罪行指控，但这些指控都和在审判中的纪录相互矛盾。在各种方式逼迫之下，不识字的贞德没有意识到死刑的逼近，签下了一份她完全看不懂的公开弃绝书。贞德还有另外一个罪名：像男人一样穿衣服。这在1431年可是一项大罪。贞德在战场上穿的是甲胄，但是在军营里却穿的男装，据记载，她穿的是一种很短的灰色的束腰外衣，套在朱红布料做的、织的很密的长筒袜子上面。那个时候还没有橡皮筋，男子的长统袜的顶端都开有成对的扣眼，中间用绳子串起来系紧。一般人用七种以上的花色来系这种袜子，而贞德用了20种，而且还系得很紧。主要是为了保护自己“奥尔良少女”的身份。在监狱里，贞德宣称，没有紧身的袜子，她感到很不安全，她要和教廷抗争到底，准备接受自己的命运。后来，她被套上一身长袍。行刑时，她没有遗言，只是向敌人发出了嘲笑。死刑于1431年5月30日在鲁昂进行，目击者描述了死刑的那一幕。贞德被绑在火刑柱上，她不断的祈祷著，并向旁边的神父请求让她握著一个小十字架。

影片聚焦法国民族女英雄圣女贞德（玛利亚·法奥康涅蒂 Maria Falconetti饰）生命的最后时刻，再现了她被出卖落入勃艮第叛军手中后，在英格兰监狱和法庭上，从受审到处死的全过程。被英格兰当局严密控制的天主教会，指控贞德为异端和女巫。法庭上，法官更伪造证据，以信仰问题不断对她施以精神上和肉体上的折磨。面对惨无人道的酷刑与子虚乌有的诬陷，贞德正气凛然、坚贞不屈。最后，贞德被押赴鲁昂市广场，被绑在火刑柱上活活烧死。　　由一代电影大师卡尔·西奥多·德莱叶执导拍摄的影片《圣女贞德蒙难记》，被称为世界十大最佳影片之一。影片以极具震撼力的艺术表现手法，再现了这段受到天主教会和英国占领军折磨的民族英雄短暂生命中的最后时刻。

在与天相连的莽莽群山之中有一座藏族村寨，由于生产的粮食不够自给，世世代代靠运盐为生。老首领天尼的儿子本应是下一任村里的头人，却在运盐的路上意外身亡，而众望所归的继任者卡玛在天尼的眼中则是为夺头人之位而蓄意害死自己儿子的罪犯。在一次新的运盐旅程开始前夕，村子里以老天尼和卡玛分别为首的两派各持一辞，互不相让。最终卡玛带领年轻人在提前于老人们占卜的日子出发，而天尼而带领自己当喇嘛的儿子和孙子以前一群老随从按占卜的日子上路。运盐队伍不仅一路风餐露宿还要应对群山之中意想不到的危险，两支运盐的队伍谁能克服艰难险阻先到达旅途的终点？本片影像风格粗狂绮丽、荡气回肠，宛如仙乐般的藏密梵音贯穿始终，令人心旷神怡。　　该片是由法国、尼泊尼、瑞士和英国四国合作，历时9个月拍摄的剧情与纪录大片，曾入围第72届奥斯卡最佳外语片奖提名以及2000年欧洲电影最佳摄影奖提名，并于当年获得了恺撒最佳摄影奖和音乐奖。

这部影片围绕三个分别处在各自生命转折点的人物。群星荟萃的演员阵容，包括伊莎贝拉·于佩尔扮演的农村姑娘来到城市沦落为妓女；纳塔莉·贝依扮演一个决心放弃掉城市工作去乡下享受田园生活的职业妇女；而雅克·迪特隆则扮演一位电视节目的导演，刚和老婆离婚，处于事业低潮。　　影片惊人地运用了慢镜头摄影，看上去相当优美，也正是本片使得离开商业电影拍摄有好几年的戈达尔重回影圈，受到相当热烈的反映，再次巩固了导演在拍摄创新电影的最前线地位。

一部有关阴谋政变的豪华传记片，取材自1930年代法国的一个真实的故事。风流潇洒的主人公是一位法国籍俄国犹太人，他曾以诈骗罪被捕入狱，出来后改名换姓四处行骗，从事非法的投机活动，最终控制了全巴黎的新闻出版界、跑马场、政界以及豪华的社交场所。他还是个不折不扣的赌徒。最终丑闻败露，与之一起倒台的还有许多受牵连的政府官员。他在追捕中不得不自杀。而这一事件同时也暴露了法国政界的内幕和丑闻，加剧了内部派系的斗争，使得法国政府经历了一次严重的政治危机，差点就垮台了。　　影片通过这样一个在上流社会靠行骗耍手段而飞黄腾达的骗子故事，来检视在那段经济不景气、人心彷徨的年代中人性的趋向和人的精神状况。中间还插入了苏联流亡人士托洛茨基来法国寻求庇护的内容，跟史塔维斯基组成鲜明的对比。编导目的在于暗喻法国政治取向的两种极端方向。桑德海姆的音乐恰到好处地配合了画面。

六人在马赛乘坐火车到巴黎。 到达后，却发现一名妇女死于车上。 警方随即调查了另外五名乘客，并怀疑其中一人是凶手，但嫌疑犯一一离奇死亡。 最后两个幸存者必须在自己成为下一个受害者之前靠自己调查清楚。

影片简单写实，镜头跟随着一个巴黎的单身女孩一天内所发生的事情而展开，故事主线也单一而实时发展，与经典片《正午》一样，戏里的时间与现实生活的时间一致，都在90分钟内，展现了女孩与男友争吵，再到酒店上班，再与一些人交谈，再经历了一些事情的困扰。　　本片讲述了年轻的巴黎女郎瓦莉一天的生活。瓦莉就要去一个四星级的大酒店当服务员，这一天她告诉男友雷米自己已有四周的身孕，而我们则将跟随瓦莉的思绪，去体会人性之中的喜怒哀乐，这些切身的体验终于使瓦莉为自己的将来作出了一个重大决定……

英国古典文学勃朗特三姐妹的传记故事

格斯·范·桑特和杰昆·菲尼克斯时隔11年再度合作，欲将四肢瘫痪的漫画家约翰·卡拉汉（Joe Callahan）的故事搬上大银幕。卡拉汉12岁就嗜酒成性并滥用药物，21岁的在酒后遭遇车祸四肢瘫痪，之后他开始重建他的生活，最终成为了一位不断超越身体局限的漫画家。

一个曾经丧失人性的刑讯逼供者.在几十年之后接受电台记者的采访重新回忆自己那段罪孽深重的过去.他以前拷问别人,现在却接受这个记者的“拷问”.在这个下午,拷问的不仅仅是他本人,也拷问了人性,拷问了整个社会制度。

1987年恺撒奖最佳女主角和最佳男配角获得者。　　讲述了两个旧友重逢后，已经是著名乐手的布朗爱上了朋友之妻……皮埃尔是小提琴演奏者，邀请他的朋友才华横溢的马尔歇到家里吃饭，并把妻子罗曼尼介绍给他认识。罗曼尼和马尔歇却因此一见钟情。　　影片一改雷奈过往的跳跃风格，改走舞台剧的戏剧形式，故事由头到尾平铺直叙，仅仅以演员的功力和话剧式的对白取胜，简直是部话剧。雷奈的御用女星艾慈玛深厚的舞台经验使她脱颖而出，赢得凯撒奖的最佳女主角。

故事发生在1789年的法国凡尔赛宫，革命的热潮席卷了整个国家，居住在宫中的王公贵族们成为了革命者们攻击的对象。为了保命，很多人决定逃跑，可是皇后玛丽（黛安·克鲁格 Diane Kruger 饰）却无法放下她高贵的尊严。长久以来，波利内公爵夫人（维吉妮·拉朵嫣 Virgi nie Ledoyen 饰）和玛丽皇后保持了暧昧而又亲密的关系，而这一次，保全波利内公爵夫人的性命则成为了玛丽皇后首当其冲需要解决的问题。　　西朵妮（蕾雅·赛杜 Léa Seydoux 饰）只是一介小小侍女，但她对玛丽皇后的忠臣和爱慕是任何人都无法相比的，即使到了这个紧要关头，她依然希望能够守在玛丽皇后的身边，为她卖命。于是，西朵妮顺理成章的成为了玛丽皇后手中的棋子，而她并不知道，自己将要面临的是怎样的命运。

Claudie, a young French woman, inherits her uncle's property in Algeria, much to the disappointment of her scheming cousins Diane and Manuel. On the ferry she meets and falls for Pierre, an idle young man who has squandered his inheritance and is on his way to beg from Christian, his rich but rough-and-ready uncle, who owns a neighbouring farm to Claudie's. Made to work on the farm by Christian as a loan condition, Pierre is soon a changed man, and proposes to Claudie. But when his Arab friend Zoubir invites the Europeans on a hunting party, Diane and Manuel see their chance to move against their cousin.

Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

Six unused scenes from WHERE LIES YOUR HIDDEN SMILE One of the more priceless of the bagatelles in this collection features a lounging Jean-Marie Straub who gives a non-stop disquisition on liberty and filmmaking while Danièle Huillet busies herself with laundry, and their dog Melchior frisks in and out of frame.

一起致命意外牵起陌生故事的延续。赛门不知道，这个黎明会一去不返。赛门和好友三人于清晨逐海冲浪，尽兴出游换来回程的疲劳驾驶，酿成无法挽回的伤害。年纪轻轻的赛门，人生才刚开始，却因车祸陷入脑死，只能靠生命维持系统活着。就在赛门父母还难以接受事实的当下，医生勇敢告知，赛门的生命可以拯救其他垂危的性命，建议进行器官捐赠配对。同一时间在巴黎，一名深受心疾威胁的母亲正在等待心脏移植，赛门的心跳，将为这位坚强母亲注入重生的力量......

国际特种部队间谍吉姆（西恩·潘 Sean Penn 饰），为了他的爱人而想要退出组织，但天不从人愿，就在他完成最后一项“任务”时，为了确保自身安全与公司利益，他必须要人间蒸发匿身他处，与心爱的人从此分开。　　离开组织在欧洲流亡多年后，吉姆以为能够脱离危险，就此过着平静的生活；无奈人生并非他想像中单纯，在刚果被神秘人物追杀的他，被迫放下所有，展开逃亡。逃亡途中他辗转联系到昔日战友，并寻求他们的协助，却也因此发现追杀行动里暗藏着不为人知的祕密，而现在，唯有找出追杀他的幕后主使，才能给他一条生路……

铅黄电影。有点实验性的Cult片，《安娜迷宫》的导演又给大家带来感官盛宴。怪奇公寓妇女失踪，墙后房间通往童年，礼盒爬出帽子刺客，壁纸起伏欲望隧道；时空循环自我谋杀，白发初恋听诊凶案，糖果夹杂玻璃碎片，爆头画皮血流满屋……

短片

伯格曼岛讲述了一对美国电影制作人克里斯（维克·克里普斯饰）和托尼（蒂姆·罗斯饰）的故事，他们在夏天来到神秘的法罗岛。在伯格曼居住和拍摄他最著名作品的这片荒野、惊险的风景中，希望为即将上映的电影找到灵感。随着分开度过的日子一天天过去，克里斯对这个岛屿的迷恋开始了，她初恋的纪念品再次浮出水面。现实和虚构之间的界限将逐渐模糊，使这对夫妇更加分离。

本片是由《会饮篇》改编而成的电视电影（TV Movie）。　　《会饮篇》（Symposium）是柏拉图对话录中的名篇。对话的背景是悲剧家阿伽松（Agathon）为庆祝自己的剧本获奖，邀请了几位朋友到家中饮酒、清谈。参与者有修辞学家斐德罗（Phaedrus）、喜剧家阿里斯托芬和苏格拉底等人。整篇对话主要由六篇对爱神厄洛斯（Eros）的颂辞组成，探讨的是爱的本质。

当约瑟夫准备加入以色列军队服兵役时，发现自己不是父母的亲身儿子，在他出生时，他与约旦河西岸的一个巴勒斯坦家庭的小孩亚辛换错了。因这一发现，两个家庭的生活突然发生了翻天覆地的变化，这一发现迫使他们重新思考各自的身份、价值和信念。　　本片围绕着巴以冲突这个历史悠久而且无法得到有效解决的问题展开，本该互相敌视的两个家庭阴差阳错的抱错了孩子并且把他们分别抚养成人——优秀的人。于是，在本片中，我们看到了民族的敌意，宗教的排斥，但是更多的是互相理解和接受的过程。“我不再是犹太人了，但是我也不是阿拉伯人。”在这样的命题下，我们发现解决这种棘手问题似乎只有一个出发点——在成为“什么人”之前首先成为一个“人”。

réalisation Judith Du Pasquier　　un film de Sylvie Quesemand Zucca et Judith Du Pasquier　　production Abacaris Films　　coproduction ARTE France　　avec la participation de LCP Assemblée nationale　　soutien Fondation France, CNC, DICOM, Paroles et Cultures, PROCIREP et ANGOA　　diffusion ARTE France　　L’anorexie reste une énigme pour les familles, pour les médecins, pour les jeunes filles elles-mêmes. Pourquoi donc s’imposent-elles ces privations extrêmes En France et en Europe, les récits éclairants de femmes guéries et les réflexions de soignants très impliqués abordent l’univers complexe des anorexies contemporaines et explorent les nouvelles manières de soigner.　　Sélection Prix Média d'Enfance Majuscule 2017

罗尼的女儿正要结婚，不巧的是泽夫正要为他的妻子举办葬礼。这一意外事件让已截然不同的两兄弟之间的分歧更大……在伦敦、巴黎、圣特罗佩与纽约之间，冲突、误解、背叛，将把这一家人炸开了，但正因这些争执与和解组成了这一部时尚爱情喜剧。

外交官杜米尼克·奥法尔任命为“南北交换机构”的法国代表。这一机构是一个拥有巨大权力的国际组织。有个代码为“奥林匹”的情报机构，将杜米尼克·奥法尔夫妇确定为“51号”和“52号”，他们搜集了解“51号”的全部档案资料，伺机采取行动。影片主要表现了这个机关特工人员介绍“51号”的有关情况，他的家庭，经历，私生活等等，并最终说明他如何别人暗害。

◎ 简　　介：　　波兰导演瓦依达将法国大革命时期的两个英雄人物搬上银幕，他们是丹东与罗伯斯庇尔，他们本来是一起分享革命胜利的革命派，却无奈因为理想的不同而分道扬镳，后来更成为夙敌。以罗伯斯庇尔为首的公安委员会，为了镇压反革命暴乱和打击投机分子，实行恐怖政策，因打击面过宽造 成人人自危。在那种环境下，...　　◎ 花　　絮：　　这是一部用新的视角探索和评价法国大革命的历史片，揭示了革命阵营内部的国民公会与救国委员会、公安委员会之间的矛盾与斗争。瓦依达对历史上的真实人物性格做了改动，将丹东描绘成一个充满理想和热忱、敢于斗争而不惜牺牲自我的英雄人物，目的在于借用法国大革命的历史来呼应其时正如火如荼的波兰团结...　　◎ 获　　奖：　　1984年 英国学院奖最佳外语片奖　　1983年 法国恺撒奖最佳导演奖　　1984年 伦敦评论协会年度最佳导演奖　　1982年 法国电影路易斯·德吕克奖　　1984年 波兰电影节评论奖

当一个人问另一个人“敢不敢”的时候，另一个人必须说“敢”，这就是游戏的规则。小男孩于连和小女孩苏菲的相遇即开始于这样一场孩童的闹剧，一个精美的铁盒子就是他们游戏的见证。说脏话，扰乱课堂，在校长室小便，内衣外穿……一个游戏两人一玩十多年，他们什么都敢，除了承认彼此相爱。　　苏菲（玛丽昂·歌迪亚 Marion Cotillard 饰）提议两人分别四年，挑战的内容是于连（吉约姆·卡内 Guillaume Canet 饰）敢不敢伤害苏菲。恍惚四年逝去，于连找到苏菲，为了游戏的进行他决定另娶她人，邀请苏菲做伴娘。受到伤害的苏菲在于连的婚礼上抛出铁盒子“你敢悔婚么？”原本最最亲密的朋友相互伤害最深。同样心痛的两个人相约再次分别十年。　　十年里，于连拥有了一切，家庭、事业、朋友，只是没了苏菲宛如没了心，原来丧失激情的生活这般索然无味。　　终于十年过去，“Love me, if you dare...”

德国慕尼黑，丈夫克里斯特告别了妻子亚丽安娜（Margit Carstensen 饰）与瘸腿女儿安吉拉（Andrea Schober 饰），赴奥斯陆公干，但他在半路中转，约会了情人并将其带到自己的乡间别墅。但他意外发现亚丽安娜与情人——自己的助手早已抵达别墅偷情，四人很快在尴尬的气氛中回过神来，坐到了一张桌子上享用晚餐。负责照料别墅的卡斯特与加百列母子注视着四人，内心各有不同的触动。当天夜里，安吉拉在保姆的陪伴下亦抵达别墅，她的出现让亚丽安娜为其腿疾绷紧的神经再次拉紧，气氛一时僵硬。　　第二天夜里，安吉拉组织别墅里的所有八人进行一场叫做“中国轮盘赌”的问答游戏，分成两组的八人互相提问作答，牵出了各自内心隐藏的秘密。

2011年3月11日，日本遭遇史上最大地震的襲擊，引發福島海嘯災難。亞歷珊卓拉剛從法國來到東京，正準備在當地法商銀行工作，卻突然遭逢這場核災危機。在工作與家庭間拉扯，逐漸浮現的恐懼與焦慮就要吞噬亞歷珊卓拉。離開或者留下，丈夫兒女與仰賴她的員工，亞歷珊卓拉該如何抉擇？

威尔斯唯一一部公映的彩色电影，故事依旧奇情：澳门富商从秘书口中听到一个爱情传说，有人为了香灯有后愿意付钱找人与妻子上床。传说归传说，但澳门富商却要使这个不朽故事成真，找来美女珍．摩露，当正是自己妻子，要她找人轰烈地做爱做的事。乍听下来真是一场天方夜谭，但影片拍来感人至深，53岁的威尔斯与成熟的珍．摩露演出动人不已，最后一个镜头更被影迷形容是「魔术」，令影片入围柏林国际电影节竞逐最佳电影金熊奖。　　The only colour film by Welles publicly released is another showcase of the absurdity of human nature. A Macau millionaire is told a legend about someone who is willing to pay a huge sum for someone who would sleep with his wife in order to produce an heir. In an act to make the legend real and to immortalise it, the millionaire finds Jeanne Moreau to be his wife and starts to search for the man who would make love to her. A potent performance by Welles and Moreau makes the film purely magical; a Golden Berlin Bear nominee for Berlin International Film Festival.

Middle class student Bob Letellier enters a new world when he meets Alain, a free-thinking rebel who, along with his group of young Parisians, has opted for a life of instant gratification instead of work and commitment. At a party, Bob meets a young woman, Mic, who appears to be just as carefree and cynical as Alain. Mic's only dream is to own a luxury car, and with Bob's help, she manages to find the money to but it. Mic's friend Clo discovers she is pregnant and, not knowing who the father is, she asks Bob to marry her. When they next meet at a party, Bob and Mic deny that they have any feelings for one another - a declaration that soon leads to tragedy...　　　　Marcel Carné is widely regarded as one of the standard bearers of French quality cinema of the 1930s and 1940s, responsible for such masterpieces as Quai des brumes (1938) and Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). How ironic then that, in 1958, towards the end of his film-making career, he should make a film which dared to portray the attitudes and behaviour of the 1950s youth, in a way that effectively captures the mood and sentiment of the time.　　　　Les Tricheurs was a hugely controversial film, not least because of its blatant depiction of adolescent free-love, and was even banned in some regions of France. It also received some intensely unfavourable reviews, most notably from the young hotheads on the Cahiers du cinéma such as François Truffaut who cited this film as a prime example of the decline of French cinema into mediocrity. In spite of all this negative press, the film proved to be an astonishing commercial success, attracting five million cinema-goers, and was awarded the Grand Prix du Cinéma français in 1958.　　　　Whilst Les Tricheurs is not as flawless as Carné's earlier masterpieces, it is nonetheless a significant work, having the power to both shock and move its audience, whilst having great entertainment value. It evokes the mood of its time in a way that few French films of this period did, depicting young people as pleasure-seeking rebels, rejecting the austerity and discipline of the previous generation whilst pursuing a life without cares, responsibilities or love. Similarities with James Dean's films of the 1950s (most notably Rebel without a Cause) are apparent, although Carné's treatment of young people is far more abstract - in his film they merely symbolise a world that has lost its way, more or less victims of post-war prosperity. Although the young people in Les Tricheurs lack the authenticity to be totally credible, the film does make an important, and indeed quite disturbing point, about where the permissive society may be heading.　　　　Much of the pleasure of the film is in the performances from its four lead actors, Jacques Charrier, Pascale Petit, Laurent Terzieff and Andréa Parisy, although only Terzieff is really convincing in his role. Marcel Carné originally considered Alain Delon and Jean-Paul Belmondo for the parts of Bob and Alain respectively, before opting for Charrier and Terzieff. As a consolation, Carné offered Belmondo a smaller part in the film - alas too small for the actor to be noticed by the public. Belmondo's breakthrough had to wait until the following year when he starred in Jean-Luc Godard's revolutionary A bout de souffle, a film which offers a very different perspective of the youth generation.

以上世纪西班牙內战为背景的政治惊悚片，前沙皇将军菲欧多带着妻子移居巴黎后，过着神秘的生活，在公产主义者受到压制的法国，菲欧多却公开声称自己的真实身份是间谍，而且是个三重间谍，同时服务于俄国的白军和红军，甚至德国的纳粹军。　　1936年的欧洲，正值西班牙内战时期。身为前任沙皇军队将军的费欧多携着他年轻的希腊妻子阿茜诺一同移居巴黎。法国人对战争漠不关心，只管取笑西班牙人。阿茜诺同情她的共产主义邻居，费欧多的态度却很暧昧，他频繁地外出，谁也不知道 他去了哪里，做了什么，他还公开宣称自己是间谍。他究竟是为谁工作的？他是忠于沙皇的白军？红军间谍？纳粹分子？还是个三重间谍？